Star Or Angel Of Bethlehem

 
I know that for centuries, we've come to believe that the star of Bethlehem in the Biblical narrative of Christ's birth was some sort of supernatural cosmic event. We've also accepted it as such because we trusted Bible translators in deciding to use the word "star".
But, was it a LITERAL star?
As explained in the Greek Interlinear concordance, the word "star" can be rendered literal or FIGURATIVE! I believe the Bible can clearly demonstrate that it in this case it was figuratively.

A STAR IS A SUN

We all know that a star is a Sun that is millions if not billions of light years away. Even though God could in His infinite power move a Sun so far away as it would appear in our sky and shine where Jesus was born, it would still not agree with the complete narrative of the Nativity story.

ARGUMENTS AGAINST BEING A LITERAL STAR

Astronomers, understanding the laws of physics, have a hard time believing the narrative and I would not blame them. A sun cannot do what the Bible said it did. Actually, sympathetic astronomers have gone out of their way to convert the star into a meteor to make it more plausible. This of course makes no sense either as we will see.

Because of this literal view, it ends up making the Bible look unscientific, erroneous and so classified as a fable, to the point that the Bible can be dismissed as man made stories and not a Divine book. This of course should not be the case.

FIGURATIVELY SPEAKING

I strongly believe the Bible is God's word and as such, does not make errors even in the sphere of science. The answer to this puzzle lies in the definition of the word "star" in the Bible.

There are TWO definitions:
  • Literal : As a sun in our Cosmos
  • Figurative : As an angel
Guess which fits better the narrative? An angel, of course.

The Distinguishing aspects of both a star and an angel:
  • They shine
  • They move in the air
  • They announce a special event or message
Angels and stars have similar attributes, so keep these in mind as we continue.

THE PROOF

The Bible often uses the word "star" to mean a "Messenger".
The mystery of the seven stars that you saw in my right hand and of the seven golden lampstands is this: The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches, and the seven lampstands are the seven churches. Revelation 1:20
Here we clearly see that the Bible names angels as "stars". These angels were used by God as messengers to the churches.
“I, Jesus, have sent my angel to give you this testimony for the churches. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.” Revelation 22:16
Even Jesus is called a star. Why? Because He was a messenger for God to fallen humanity.
We also have the prophetic message as something completely reliable, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts. 2 Peter 1:19
This verse poetically describes Jesus as the Morning Star. Note He was a message, He shines and then rises, in this case, not the sky but in our hearts.
These people are blemishes at your love feasts, eating with you without the slightest qualm—shepherds who feed only themselves. They are clouds without rain, blown along by the wind; autumn trees, without fruit and uprooted—twice dead. 13 They are wild waves of the sea,foaming up their shame; wandering stars, for whom blackest darkness has been reserved forever. Jude 12
 
In this verse, the Bible calls these false teachers as "wandering stars". Note they wander and bring a message, in this case a false message, but instead of light, they offer darkness.

On a secular note, we call movie actors "stars"! For similar reasons, they shine and present a message to us from a stage that is most often above us.

EVIDENCE IN THE NARRATIVE
After they had heard the king, they went on their way, and the star they had seen when it rose went ahead of them until it stopped over the place where the child was. Matthew 2:9
Let's all agree, a Sun could not have led the Magi through the streets of Bethlehem and then stop right above the house where Jesus was living. It would not make sense scientifically and would make the Biblical narrative look ridiculous or faulty at best. The star being an angel is the only correct, Biblical and logical explanation that importantly honors God's word as being divinely written.

PROPER INTERPRETATION

I final and important note concerns the "context". To properly understand the definition of which "star" was intended, we have to consider the context in which it was used. The context concerned the advent of a new revelation from God and not a discussion of the cosmos! The "star" had nothing to do with the subject of the cosmos but of a supernatural event where men were being informed and guided by God.

Well I hope I didn't dull the ambiance of the Christmas story but rather strengthened your faith in God's perfect word.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Jesus's return between 2028-2031 - A Biblical approach to estimating the time

Yes, there have been lot's of false dates given for the end of the world and Jesus's return but this approach is simple, clearer and I believe more acceptable according to the Bible. First, let's clear up one annoying misunderstood verse. Christians use this verse to argue that we will never know when His return is immanent, 36 But about that day or hour no one knows , not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son,[a] but only the Father. 37 As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. Matthew 24 First, let's make it clear that this verse is not speaking of the Rapture but of His return to Earth after the tribulation. Matthew 24 is all about the Tribulation period and Jesus's return to earth. This is clearly explained in this verse, 30 Then will appear the sign of the Son of Man in heaven. And then all the peoples of the earth[c] will mourn when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven, with power and great gl
Read more

Exodus-Image of the Rapture

Image
  Most Christians have come to believe that in the Bible, Egypt represents the world and that Israel represents the heavenly kingdom. We can then also say that as Jews were the believers in the Old Testament, the Christians are in the New. With this in mind, we can then allude that time spent in Egypt by the Jews could also be an image of the Christian's time on earth during the Church age. If we agree to this comparison, we can then conclude that the Exodus of the Jews from Egypt can also be a prophetic image of the Rapture. Here are the similarities: Verses from Exodus 12 Old Testament New Testament Notes 23 For the Lord will pass through to smite the Egyptians; and when he seeth the blood upon the lintel , and on the two side posts, the Lord will pass over the door, and will not suffer the destroyer to come in unto your houses to smite you. The Passover. Jesus death on the cross as our Passover. The salvation sacrifice proceeds the departure or Rapture of God's
Read more

Is the star of Bethlehem a REAL star?

Image
For centuries we've come to believe that the star of Bethlehem in the Biblical narrative of Christ's birth was some sort of supernatural cosmic event.  But, was it a LITERAL star? As explained in the Greek Interlinear concordance, the word "star" can be rendered LITERAL or FIGURATIVE! My conclusion it should be considered figuratively or something else than a real cosmic star. LITERAL VIEW : THE STAR WAS A SUN We all know that a star is a Sun that can be millions if not billions of light years away. Even though God could in His infinite power move a Sun so far away as it would appear in our sky and shine where Jesus was born, it would still not agree with the complete narrative of the Nativity story. ARGUMENTS AGAINST BEING A LITERAL STAR Astronomers, understanding the laws of physics, have a hard time believing the narrative and I would not blame them. A sun cannot do what the Bible said it did. Actually, sympathetic astronomers have gone out of their way to convert
Read more